City Council Decides Against Complete Driving Range Extension
South Pasadena City Council votes against the extension of the Arroyo Seco Golf Course Driving Range, which was framed as a debate between development and the environment.
After a lengthy debate and strong opposition from local residents, the one-acre land buffer between the Arroyo Seco Golf Course Driving Range and the South Pasadena Nature Park may remain intact.
The council voted 3-2 Wednesday night against the full extension of the Arroyo Seco Golf Course Driving Range to the border of the South Pasadena Nature Park. Mayor Mike Ten and council member David Sifuentes voted in favor of the extension, while council members Michael Cacciotti, Philip Putnam and Richard Schneider opposed.
The extension item will return to closed session, where the city council will direct staff in their negotiations with the potential golf course operator, Donovan Brothers.
“We brought this out of closed session to let you know our thoughts,” Council member Philip C. Putnam told the crowd. “We need to take this back to closed session and go out and look at this property again.”
The Arroyo Seco Golf Course and Racquet Center Lease Subcommittee, along with the course’s potential new operator, wanted to increase the length of the driving range to make the range more attractive to avid golfers and increase revenue. During the city's presentation, several golf consultants stressed that the range's current length prevents experienced golfers from practicing there in favor of a longer range where they can see their ball fly farther.
Councilman Richard Schneider, who strongly opposed the item, saw the extension as a debate between open space and money.
“I’m all in favor of Donovan Brothers doing their magic, with the exception of this little plot of land,” Schneider said at the meeting. “It may not be a deal-breaker for the Donovan Brothers, but it will be a deal-breaker for the city.”
The estimated $125,000 extension, which would be paid for by the new golf course operator, would include the installation of new golf tees, new greens and a 75-foot fence at the end of the driving range.
Councilman Cacciotti felt that the new fence would negatively affect the experience of tranquility and harmony offered by the Nature Park.
“What’s your vision of South Pasadena?” Cacciotti asked the council. “There needs to be a balance between making money and having a beautiful environment.”
Caccitoti noted that the one-acre space is full of biological diversity and shouldn’t be altered.
“This is not a wasteland–it’s a wildlife sanctuary,” Cacciotti said. “Open space brings the human spirit tranquility that we’re going to destroy.”
The debate, which lasted until 1 a.m., drew several local residents who passionately opposed the matter.
“You are choosing to destroy habitat in our city,” South Pasadena resident Beverly Beaver said during the public comment section. “I don’t think you’re thinking about the general plan–to maintain and enhance natural resource areas.”
Mayor Ten urged the council to stop postponing issues and move forward with the extension.
“For the city to move forward we need to be ready to make changes,” Ten said.
A new operator will take over the golf from Scott Lohman on July 1.
For more on the driving range extension, click here.
Ron Rosen
5:31 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011
Although the article says that the golf course extension was defeated, after reading it, I'm not sure if anything was decided. Can anyone help me out here?
Jennifer Smith
7:09 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011
Hi Ron,
As of right now, the City Council has decided against extending the driving range for the full length. The full extension would have removed the 1 acre land buffer that is currently between the driving range and the nature park. They'll now take the matter back into closed session and decide if they want to do a partial driving range extension or do no extension at all. Hope that helps!
Drew Ready
10:35 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011
Ask any arborist, the large oaks and sycamore trees will not likely survive construction, grading and soil compaction above in the root zone. Most of the parcel is on a grade many feet above the current range and severe grading will be needed. Additionally, the oaks won’t acclimate to the abundance of water required by turfgrass, they will succumb eventually.
Ron Rosen
5:19 am on Friday, April 8, 2011
Do you know the rationale for meeting in closed session?
Mike Ten
9:08 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Ron
I think this is a non violation of any protocol , but I'm sure you'll point that out if it is.
My understanding is that the expansion of the length of the driving range is just one issue of a negotiated business contract with the City. The open discussion last week allowed the public to have input on that element for and against which will help the Council make it's final decision on the entire contract.
Hope that helps.
Gary Pia
8:43 am on Tuesday, April 12, 2011
"It is a general popular error to imagine the loudest complainers for the public to be the most anxious for its welfare." Edmund Burke, British philosopher and statesman.
Drew Ready
11:35 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011
"Man is timid and apologetic; he is no longer upright; he dares not say "I think," "I am," but quotes some saint or sage”
Ralph Waldo Emerson